How the Ferguson Protest Has Its Roots in the Racial Unrest of the 1960s | History Hit

How the Ferguson Protest Has Its Roots in the Racial Unrest of the 1960s

Alex Browne

15 Aug 2018

The protests that occurred in 2014 in Ferguson, Missouri have highlighted once again that the USA’s racially tempestuous history is still shaping communities.

This latest unrest resembles the race riots that rocked northern cities in the 1960s. For example those in Philadelphia, Harlem and Rochester in 1964 were all in the response to the police beating or killing a black citizen.

It is a template for many modern racial confrontations – frustrated black communities turn on a police force that they consider prejudiced and oppressive.

Martin Luther King's life, struggles, successes & the enduring power of his words.
Listen Now

Before the rise of the civil rights movement racist violence usually involved mobs of white citizens forming militias spontaneously and attacking blacks, often with the complicity but not sole active participation of the police.

The transition between the form of violence in the early 20th century and that seen in the 1960s can be explained by a single trend –  the police gradually became a proxy for racially conservative white communities.

As vigilante activity was restricted through tighter laws and external political pressure, the police, drawing almost exclusively from the white community were charged with defending the whites from the ‘black enemy.’

In the 1960s, in response to black activism, police in racially divided communities began to fully adopt a front-line, war-like mentality. They were responsible for opposing a supposed threat to the existing social order.

Perhaps the most notorious instance of this mentality in action was in 1963 in Birmingham, Alabama. The thuggish Police Commissioner Eugene ‘Bull’ Connor, a publicity seeking racist, ordered high-intensity fire hoses and police dogs turned on a crowd of peaceful civil rights protesters, many of whom were children.

Dan talks to giant of journalism, Sy Hersh, about the many things he's covered in his long career, from Vietnam to Iraq to Trump.
Listen Now
Scenes of this violence were broadcast globally and were generally met with horror within the USA. However, attitudes morphed as the civil rights movement migrated north and concomitantly adopted a more militant tone. Frustration at slow progress on civil rights, and the especially desperate situation for many blacks in the northern ghettos, manifest in extensive and alarming rioting and looting.

As race riots rocked major northern centres the matter became one of social order. Richard Nixon’s victory in 1968, and the fact that George Wallace won 10% of the popular vote running as an independent, suggest that Americans favoured a return to conservative values.

Soon therefore northern police were adopting the front-line approach of their southern comrades, interpreting black unrest as a threat to social order that must be contained. Combined with the war on crime under Nixon this mutated into the policy of targeting policing which is the bane of black communities today.

It is this general historical trend that has perpetuated a brand of protest that one sees in Ferguson today. A mutual suspicion between black and white communities has been created by the culmination of several processes.

Professor Mary Fulbrook talks to Dan about the justice process that followed the Holocaust, about what drove people to commit war crimes and what stopped people from resisting them.
Watch Now

Alex Browne